Writers and Their Probablies

The other day, I was answering a question on-line from a young reader who wanted to know why a certain thing in my story had happened. In my reply, I told her that she had an excellent question, that the story was vague on that point — but, I added, I would tell her my theory, and so I did.

It occurred to me that I’ve been answering questions that way for years, since the time other people began reading stories I’d written. I can remember a colleague twenty-one years ago asking me a what or why question about Dragonfly, and when my answer began with “I think it’s probably because . . .” my friend was intrigued. “Why do you say ‘probably’?” he wanted to know. “You’re the author!” — to which I thought, Yes? So what? What does being the author qualify me for?

For people who have not spent much time around us fiction writers, it may seem startling how we talk about our imaginary worlds and our characters with distance, with a shrug, with a pronounced lack of ownership or even responsibility. Why is the story the way it is? If you’ve given it your attention, your guess may well be as good as ours. We’re happy to guess along with you.

My wife is quite used to fiction writers now, but she found it surprising at first how the members of our local, like-minded group of fantasy writers would talk about our characters not behaving, not doing what we expected — and when the characters showed such willfulness, we gave each other high fives, as if we’d done something right.

Dear Readers, we ask your patience with our theories, our noncommittal but impassioned probablies and our I supposes  when we’re explaining the books and stories with our own names on them. And if you still don’t understand the fiction writer’s relationship to the story, try asking a parent about his or her children, about their choices, their wardrobes, their behavior, the things they keep on their shelves. You may get strikingly similar answers.

For these places and characters are our children. They pass through us very narrow channels on their way into the world. We guide and coax them in their first steps, in their first words. We listen hard to discern their meanings. We may try to trim their language until we learn to know better. They bear some of our features; they benefit or suffer from our experiences. But quickly, if we’re doing even a half-decent job, they prove that they are not us.

God willing, they’ll go on being themselves when we’re gone. God willing, you may meet them out there somewhere.

 

5 Responses to Writers and Their Probablies

  1. DayLily says:

    Sounds right to me! There is a similar dynamic at work in the creation of my choral works. Here’s an excerpt from a recent essay on my newest choral work: “My process for setting “Come, All True-Hearted Southern Boys” is a method that I learned from Alice Parker. I allow the words to create the tune and the tune to create its own setting. I cooperate with the process, with the work itself as it develops. . . . Perhaps this piece of music is an exotic plant that grows through time instead of through physical space; from the “seed” of the first few notes to the flowering of the last phrase, the music grows as one organic whole. I provide proper growing conditions, observe the growth, and gently prune the plant when needed.”

  2. fsdthreshold says:

    Thanks, DayLily! It’s interesting to hear how this same principle applies to your composition. I’m curious about how the words of a text create the tune.

    • DayLily says:

      Here’s how it works for me. I read the words over and over until I know them well. It is helpful to read aloud so that I physically form the words with my mouth. Gradually a rhythm that suits the words emerges. As I repeat the words in rhythm, the pitches start to join the rhythm. So the tune, both rhythm and pitches, grows out of the words.

  3. fsdthreshold says:

    I appreciate hearing this, DayLily. Thank you. It does sound like a very organic process. Reading the words aloud must also help you with crafting musical lines that vocalists can actually sing. I remember a composer friend telling me that a common problem among his students is that they write vocal lines that are impossible for singers.

    • DayLily says:

      Interesting! These students must not be singers, then. It’s hard to write well for the voice (or any instrument) if you don’t know what it can do well, what makes it sound the best.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *